Publications

Download

Boycott or Buycott: The Aftermath of Corporate Activism

Download
Suggested Citation

Warren, N. (2021). Boycott or Buycott: The Aftermath of Corporate Activism. NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 13(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0014

Year

2021

Authors
Nooshin L. Warren
Publication title
Boycott or Buycott: The Aftermath of Corporate Activism
Publication
NIM Marketing Intelligence Review
Download

Boycott or Buycott: The Aftermath of Corporate Activism

Keywords: Corporate Activism, Boycott, Buycott, Socio-political Risks

Abstract

Some stakeholders, notably investors, might be worried that debatable activism interferes with the goal of making profits. Therefore, they might react negatively to corporate activism. On average, there was a half percent dip in stock prices as companies engaged in activism. However, if the activism was aligned with a company´s stakeholders’ values, stock prices increased. The effect for customer and legislators was stronger than for employees. Misalignment with all three groups accounted for the highest loss. Brand activism aligned with consumers political ideologies, further increased sales, and the positive effects were persistent, over time.
To be successful, companies should carefully select their engagements to avoid being punished.  When deciding whether to engage in controversial activism, they should have a closer look at key stakeholders, such as customers, regulators, and employees.

Authors

  • Nooshin L. Warren, Assistant Professor of Marketing, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, USA, nwarren@arizona.edu
Share Publication

Other articles of the MIR issue “Brand Activism”

Here you can find more exciting articles of this issue.

To the entire issue

Brand Activism Is Here to Stay: Here’s Why

Brand activism involves a publicly stated position and goes beyond simply fulfilling a social responsibility. It seeks to proactively cha...

Read more

Turning Social Risk to Your Brand’s Advantage

Employment practices, civic responsibilities, philanthropy, environmental stewardship, the conduct of corporate executives and employees,...

Read more

Should Your Brand Pick a Side? How Market Share Determines the Impact of Divisive Corporate Political Stances

When the public opinion on a social matter is divided, it is riskier for large brands to engage in activism than for small brands. As lon...

Read more

Lobbying and the Like: Managing the Regulatory Environment

Companies not only stand up for or against specific matters in plain sight of the customer, they also pursue their interests less publicl...

Read more

Tweeter-in-Chief Donald J. Trump: The Story of the Downfall of a Brand

Trump’s frustration with mainstream “fake news” media led him to focus his communications on social media and Twitter in particular. An...

Read more

Purpose Beyond Profit: Things That Matter When Millennials Go Job Hunting

In a survey of future leaders, millennials answered what motivates them in their careers. Having a positive impact on society was the mos...

Read more

(Cass) Bayes Business School: Rebranding Due to Slavery Links

The killing of George Floyd by a police officer in June of 2020 put the spotlight on brands with any history of racial injustice. One of...

Read more
Scroll to top